View source for FoulkVictor455

Visit Google, Yahoo, MSN or a single of the lesser search engines, and you get a couple of million outcomes for just about any search term. Despite this impressive depth of outcomes, most users take into account only a couple of of the WebPages getting pointed to. A lot of analysis indicates that most searchers exit search engine outcome pages to visit a single of the best 3 outcomes. That raises the query: What about the remaining million plus outcomes? Are they all worthless in the labyrinth of the Net? Or are they snared by the constraints of the algorithms that search engines use. Surely there can be far better results than the ones dished out to us.

WE Require A SEARCH-ENGINE TO SEARCH SEARCH-ENGINE Results!

Based on the above premise, I set out on a mission to simplify search engine results. But, attempt as I may possibly, I could not find an automated strategy to simplify search engine outcomes. I believe that is logical, otherwise these multi-billion dollar behemoths would have carried out so themselves. So, I believed: What is that one thing that I can do which the Googles and Yahoos of the planet can't do. And the swift answer was: I can use human / private discretion in selecting search final results. This would bypass the legion of search engine optimizers who preserve building link recognition to rise up in search pages.

CAN HUMAN Chosen SEARCH Final results BEAT ALGORITHM Chosen SEARCH Outcomes?

Hard to say, but you can appear for oneself. Compare the Google outcomes for Hair Removal ( and my selected results for Hair Removal ( There is some overlap, but the results that I display are a result of my private visit to the listed pages.

CONCLUSIONS

As search engines grow to be greater and faster, there is a require for a human touch to search benefits. In this continual struggle in between spammy (scammy?) search engine optimizers and search engine engineers, the searcher can be the victim. [ Activity ]