DugasFranke952

Then there is the most universal of all symbols, the Swastika (pictured). At a single time it was believed that the Buddhists carried it all over the world with them, but it has been identified out that ages ahead of Buddhism it was employed amongst nations. In Old Babylon and in Egypt it was to be found. What does this show? All these symbols could not have been purely conventional.There should be some reason for them some natural association in between them and the human thoughts. Language is not the outcome of convention it is not that individuals ever agreed to represent particular tips by specific words there by no means was an concept with out a corresponding word or a word without having a corresponding notion tips and words are in their nature inseparable. The symbols to represent concepts may possibly be sound symbols or colour symbols. Deaf and dumb people have to consider with other than sound symbols. Every thought in the mind has a type as its counterpart. This is referred to as in Sanskrit philosophy Nama - rupa -- name and form.

It is as not possible to generate by convention a technique of symbols as it is to create a language. In the world's ritualistic symbols we have an expression of the religious thought of humanity. It is easy to say that there is no use of rituals and temples and all such paraphernalia each and every child says that in modern day times. But it must be simple for all to see that those who worship inside a temple are in numerous respects diverse from those who will not worship there. Therefore the association of particular temples, rituals, and other concrete types with specific religions has a tendency to bring into the minds of the followers of these religions the thoughts for which these concrete issues stand as symbols and it is not wise to ignore rituals and symbology altogether. The study and practice of these factors kind naturally a component of Karma-Yoga.

To get much more information visit : read sell your bike