GreyWilkens51

Then there is the most universal of all symbols, the Swastika (pictured). At one particular time it was believed that the Buddhists carried it all more than the globe with them, but it has been identified out that ages just before Buddhism it was employed among nations. In Old Babylon and in Egypt it was to be identified. What does this show? All these symbols could not have been purely conventional.There have to be some purpose for them some all-natural association in between them and the human thoughts. Language is not the result of convention it is not that folks ever agreed to represent particular concepts by specific words there in no way was an notion with no a corresponding word or a word without a corresponding concept tips and words are in their nature inseparable. The symbols to represent ideas could be sound symbols or colour symbols. Deaf and dumb men and women have to consider with other than sound symbols. Every single believed in the thoughts has a form as its counterpart. This is called in Sanskrit philosophy Nama - rupa -- name and type.

It is as not possible to create by convention a technique of symbols as it is to produce a language. In the world's ritualistic symbols we have an expression of the religious thought of humanity. It is simple to say that there is no use of rituals and temples and all such paraphernalia each baby says that in modern day instances. But it should be easy for all to see that these who worship inside a temple are in many respects different from those who will not worship there. As a result the association of specific temples, rituals, and other concrete forms with particular religions has a tendency to bring into the minds of the followers of those religions the thoughts for which these concrete factors stand as symbols and it is not wise to ignore rituals and symbology altogether. The study and practice of these items form naturally a part of Karma-Yoga.

To get far more info check out : second hand trailer