MundayBratton591

Then there is the most universal of all symbols, the Swastika (pictured). At one time it was believed that the Buddhists carried it all over the planet with them, but it has been identified out that ages just before Buddhism it was employed among nations. In Old Babylon and in Egypt it was to be located. What does this show? All these symbols could not have been purely traditional.There must be some cause for them some natural association among them and the human thoughts. Language is not the outcome of convention it is not that individuals ever agreed to represent certain ideas by specific words there in no way was an notion without having a corresponding word or a word without having a corresponding notion tips and words are in their nature inseparable. The symbols to represent tips might be sound symbols or colour symbols. Deaf and dumb men and women have to believe with other than sound symbols. Each believed in the thoughts has a form as its counterpart. This is referred to as in Sanskrit philosophy Nama - rupa -- name and form.

It is as impossible to generate by convention a technique of symbols as it is to create a language. In the world's ritualistic symbols we have an expression of the religious thought of humanity. It is simple to say that there is no use of rituals and temples and all such paraphernalia every baby says that in contemporary instances. But it should be easy for all to see that those who worship inside a temple are in many respects different from those who will not worship there. Consequently the association of certain temples, rituals, and other concrete types with specific religions has a tendency to bring into the minds of the followers of those religions the thoughts for which these concrete factors stand as symbols and it is not wise to ignore rituals and symbology altogether. The study and practice of these things form naturally a element of Karma-Yoga.

To get a lot more info visit : used audi a8 for sale