StarksBounds846

Then there is the most universal of all symbols, the Swastika (pictured). At a single time it was believed that the Buddhists carried it all over the world with them, but it has been found out that ages ahead of Buddhism it was utilised among nations. In Old Babylon and in Egypt it was to be found. What does this show? All these symbols could not have been purely conventional.There need to be some explanation for them some organic association in between them and the human thoughts. Language is not the outcome of convention it is not that individuals ever agreed to represent certain concepts by certain words there by no means was an thought without having a corresponding word or a word without having a corresponding concept ideas and words are in their nature inseparable. The symbols to represent concepts may be sound symbols or colour symbols. Deaf and dumb individuals have to feel with other than sound symbols. Every believed in the thoughts has a type as its counterpart. This is called in Sanskrit philosophy Nama - rupa -- name and type.

It is as impossible to produce by convention a technique of symbols as it is to create a language. In the world's ritualistic symbols we have an expression of the religious thought of humanity. It is straightforward to say that there is no use of rituals and temples and all such paraphernalia every single child says that in modern times. But it need to be easy for all to see that these who worship inside a temple are in several respects distinct from those who will not worship there. Consequently the association of distinct temples, rituals, and other concrete forms with particular religions has a tendency to bring into the minds of the followers of those religions the thoughts for which these concrete factors stand as symbols and it is not smart to ignore rituals and symbology altogether. The study and practice of these things kind naturally a part of Karma-Yoga.

To get a lot more information pay a visit to : buy toyota auris